9eaacb50-e855-46e1-bde4-4a7438ddfb83 Schneider, Sharon, K. sharon.schneider@usda.gov 2024-09-27T17:15:30.246841Z ISO 19115:2003/19139 1.0 WGS 1984 Soil, crop, and weed communities as affected by soil erosion and topsoil replacement in a Mollisol landform (a six-year soil-landscape rehabilitation study) 2024-03-08 10.15482/USDA.ADC/25206968 These data provide field measurements at two geographical sites of plant and soil as affected by (a) tillage and water erosion and (b) replacement of translocated topsoil through soil-landscape rehabilitation. Data include pre-restoration soil properties, a digital elevation model, and tillage and water erosion estimates. Data reported after restoration include annual assessments of crop emergence, biomass and grain yield; soil physical, chemical, and biological properties; weed communities; and weather information. The Stevens County, Minnesota site was a heavily eroded site while the Roberts County, South Dakota site was moderately eroded. The data can be used to develop agronomic best management practices to improve crop production and to protect environmental and soil health. The data also could contribute to meta-analyses describing effects of erosion and soil-landscape rehabilitation (translocating soil from areas of net deposition to areas of net soil loss by erosion) on crop performance and changes in soil properties. These data provide field measurements at two geographical sites of plant and soil as affected by (a) tillage and water erosion and (b) replacement of translocated topsoil through soil-landscape rehabilitation. Data include pre-restoration soil properties, a digital elevation model, and tillage and water erosion estimates. Data reported after restoration include annual assessments of crop emergence, biomass and grain yield; soil physical, chemical, and biological properties; weed communities; and weather information. The Stevens County, Minnesota site was a heavily eroded site while the Roberts County, South Dakota site was moderately eroded. The data can be used to develop agronomic best management practices to improve crop production and to protect environmental and soil health. The data also could contribute to meta-analyses describing effects of erosion and soil-landscape rehabilitation (translocating soil from areas of net deposition to areas of net soil loss by erosion) on crop performance and changes in soil properties. Schneider, Sharon, K. sharon.schneider@usda.gov Sharon K. Schneider Apurba K. Sutradhar Thomas E. Schumacher David A. Lobb soybeans corn soil fertility soil profiles nutrients soil carbon landscape restoration soil restoration tillage erosion soil quality best management practices South Dakota eroded soils Minnesota grain yield biomass soil properties water erosion tillage Mollisols topsoil weeds National Agricultural Library Thesaurus (NALT) USDA NAL Keywords 2015 2021 Edition USDA National Agricultural Library * National Agricultural Library Thesaurus (NALT) Coordinator 10301 Baltimore Ave Beltsville, MD 20705 United States of America agref@usda.gov https://agclass.nal.usda.gov/ HTTP Web Browser USDA National Agricultural Library Thesaurus and Glossary Home Page The Thesaurus and Glossary are online vocabulary tools of agricultural terms in English and Spanish and are cooperatively produced by the National Agricultural Library, USDA, and the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture as well as other Latin American agricultural institutions belonging to the Agriculture Information and Documentation Service of the Americas (SIDALC). A controlled vocabulary of keywords to classify dataset records in Ag Data Commons Agricultural, veterinary and food sciences > Agriculture, land and farm management Fields of Research (FoR) Classification FoR Classification 2020-06-30 creation 1.3.6 Figshare https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Fields_of_Research_FoR_Classification/10305443 HTTP Web Browser Fields of Research (FoR) Classification The 2008 ANZSRC FoR classification allows R&D activity to be categorised according to the field of research. In this respect, it is the methodology used in the R&D that is being considered. information Resource Provider Department of Agriculture=5 > Agricultural Research Service=005:018 OMB Bureau Codes Office of Management and Budget Bureau Codes 2016 revision 2016 OMB Bureau Codes https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/a11_current_year/app_c.pdf HTTP Web Browser APPENDIX C—LISTING OF OMB AGENCY/BUREAU AND TREASURY CODES In the MAX system, OMB assigns and uses agency and bureau codes, which are associated with agency and bureau titles that are published in the Budget.PDF file. information Resource Provider Complete list of bureau codes Department of Agriculture=5 > National Research=005:040 Federal Program Inventory US Federal Program Codes 2013-09-16 revision Fiscal Year 2013 Office of Management and Budget https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb HTTP Web Browser Office of Management and Budget The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) serves the President of the United States in overseeing the implementation of his vision across the Executive Branch. Specifically, OMB’s mission is to assist the President in meeting his policy, budget, management and regulatory objectives and to fulfill the agency’s statutory responsibilities. information Originator Office of Management and budget. File FederalProgramInventory_FY13_MachineReadable_091613.xls, current loation unknown. USDA-ARS: 3080-12620-005-00D USDA-ARS: 3080-12620-003-00D USDA-ARS: 5447-12620-002-00D USDA-ARS: 3645-12610-001-00D USDA-ARS: 3645-11000-003-00D Crossref Funding Crossref Open Funder Registry 2016-08-11 1.2 Crossref funder.registry@crossref.org https://www.crossref.org/services/funder-registry/ HTTP Web Browser Open Funder Registry Funding data provides a standard way to report funding sources for published scholarly research. Publishers deposit funding information from articles and other content using a standard taxonomy of funder names. A common taxonomy of over 11,000 funding body names that funding data initiative participants should use to normalize Funder Names and IDs. CC0 License Type Public Domain Creative Commons License Type 2016 Creative Commons * Creative Commons contact (415) 429-6753 PO Box 1866 Mountain View CA 94042 United States of America info@creativecommons.org https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ HTTP Web Browser Creative Commons Licenses The Creative Commons copyright licenses and tools forge a balance inside the traditional “all rights reserved” setting that copyright law creates. Our tools give everyone from individual creators to large companies and institutions a simple, standardized way to grant copyright permissions to their creative work. The combination of our tools and our users is a vast and growing digital commons, a pool of content that can be copied, distributed, edited, remixed, and built upon, all within the boundaries of copyright law. Creative Commons and other open licenses recognized by the United States federal government. Please choose from U.S. Public Domain, Creative Commons CCZero, Creative Commons Attribution, or Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike. Soybean Corn Soil fertility Soil profile Plant nutrients Soil carbon Productivity Landscape restoration Soil restoration Spatial variation Soil health Water erosion Tillage erosion Soil erosion Crop productivity Crop production farming environment 2005-10-02 2011-11-30 -98.00 -95.00 45.00 46.00 docx 1 XLSX 1 https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/25206968 DOI Data files Data files for <b>Soil, crop, and weed communities as affected by soil erosion and topsoil replacement in a Mollisol landform (a six-year soil-landscape rehabilitation study)</b>